When you have an ache, it doesn't stop you, but it affects your
performance. When you have multiple aches, the impacts pile on and can
be debilitating. Cumulative impacts on the environment are like
this--they add up until ecosystem processes stop functioning, or the cumulative noise and light pollution make you just want to move away. And
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analyses have traditionally
done a very poor job of analyzing and mitigating cumulative effects. If
they had done a good job, our impacts on the environment would have been
arrested at 1970 levels when CEQA was passed. Just imagine if we still had a 1970s level of development in California (ok, skip the beards and bell bottoms). In a state where so many
impacts are already cumulatively significant, as a general rule, it just
makes sense to mitigate any new impacts. It is the only responsible way to act. We typically don't do that,
but in the case of Coho Salmon in San Geronimo Valley, the courts have ruled that we should. And Marin County is legally on the hook for doing it.
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Monday, December 14, 2015
Somewhere West of Joshua Tree
There is a Vermillion Flycatcher in a parking lot
There is a boy on his bike at the beach looking up at the snowy mountains
There is an old man in a hospital wishing he could be hiking in the mountains
There is a woman giving food to a hungry and homeless man
There is a baby taking her first steps
There is a cat sleeping in a sunny window
There is a girl climbing up to her treehouse
There is a tearful couple saying goodbye at the airport
There is a dad stuck in traffic on his way home to his family
There is a mother and son who are reunited at the train station
There is an ocean breeze cooling a runner's hot back
There is the aroma of delicious food in a backyard
There is a family gathering around a table
There is a group of kids playing in a creek
There is a surfer catching her first wave
There is a boy exchanging a glance with a girl
There is a mother giving birth
A hopeful person is planting a tree
A caring person is picking up litter
A loving person is smiling to say hi
There is a boy on his bike at the beach looking up at the snowy mountains
There is an old man in a hospital wishing he could be hiking in the mountains
There is a woman giving food to a hungry and homeless man
There is a baby taking her first steps
There is a cat sleeping in a sunny window
There is a girl climbing up to her treehouse
There is a tearful couple saying goodbye at the airport
There is a dad stuck in traffic on his way home to his family
There is a mother and son who are reunited at the train station
There is an ocean breeze cooling a runner's hot back
There is the aroma of delicious food in a backyard
There is a family gathering around a table
There is a group of kids playing in a creek
There is a surfer catching her first wave
There is a boy exchanging a glance with a girl
There is a mother giving birth
A hopeful person is planting a tree
A caring person is picking up litter
A loving person is smiling to say hi
Sunday, November 22, 2015
To Los Angeles in the 1840s
In my last update of my genealogy research from a little over a year ago, I had discovered several new exciting leads for who and where my great great grandparents were prior to appearing in the Los Angeles 1850 census. After examining the data again, and after discovering a new baptismal record in Mexico, I am now prepared to fully go with the hypothesis I raised a year ago.
I looked at this again because my sister wanted to join the Society of California Pioneers. The application required submission of a family tree, with the membership requirement that an ancestor have been in California prior to January 1, 1850. This requirement disqualified Henry Schwerin, because although some of his brothers arrived in 1849, he didn't arrive in San Francisco until January 1850. He missed the Society's deadline by a month. So that sends us back to our dad's side of the family, and the mystery of when my great great grandparents arrived in L.A.
Sunday, October 4, 2015
Mono County: What it needs to do to help recover Lahontan Cutthroat Trout
When I read about California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) lawsuits, and when I read poorly-written Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), it makes me wish I could start a nonprofit environmental consulting firm that could set the example for doing good CEQA practice while keeping costs affordable. It really isn't that hard to follow the law and do good CEQA if you don't have an agenda other than the intent of CEQA, which includes:
One such frustrating EIR is the EIR for the Mono County General Plan Update. Now, most of this EIR is quite good. It actually impresses me as one of the better-written EIRs I've ever read. The biological resources section is a joy to read. But where it falls apart is the Cumulative Effects section.
And that is where most EIRs fail. In California, we generally don't do a good job of analyzing cumulative effects, so this EIR isn't out of the ordinary in this regard. But two wrongs don't make a right--we can and must do better. But more about that in part 2 about where Marin County fails, gets sued, and fails again.
In an EIR chock full of significant individual impacts due to policies that would encourage a build-out population of 48,702--this is a massive increase in population of a remote, rural county full of hazards and sensitive resources--the Mono County General Plan Update Draft EIR takes 4 pages of the 6-page cumulative effects section to discuss the "Water Transfer Program," a federal program to acquire water rights to protect and restore Walker Lake, Nevada and its decimated native fisheries.
- It is necessary to provide a high-quality environment that at all times is healthful and pleasing to the senses and intellect of man.
- Develop and maintain a high-quality environment now and in the future, and take all action necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance the environmental quality of the state.
- Ensure that the long-term protection of the environment, consistent with the provision of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian, shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions.
One such frustrating EIR is the EIR for the Mono County General Plan Update. Now, most of this EIR is quite good. It actually impresses me as one of the better-written EIRs I've ever read. The biological resources section is a joy to read. But where it falls apart is the Cumulative Effects section.
And that is where most EIRs fail. In California, we generally don't do a good job of analyzing cumulative effects, so this EIR isn't out of the ordinary in this regard. But two wrongs don't make a right--we can and must do better. But more about that in part 2 about where Marin County fails, gets sued, and fails again.
In an EIR chock full of significant individual impacts due to policies that would encourage a build-out population of 48,702--this is a massive increase in population of a remote, rural county full of hazards and sensitive resources--the Mono County General Plan Update Draft EIR takes 4 pages of the 6-page cumulative effects section to discuss the "Water Transfer Program," a federal program to acquire water rights to protect and restore Walker Lake, Nevada and its decimated native fisheries.
Walker Lake, NV in the foreground, and its Mono County, CA headwaters in the background, Fall 2007. |
Friday, September 18, 2015
The Sound of Wind on Rock
After my thrilling sunrise climb of a peak in Lassen Volcanic National Park last year, I had to do it again this year. And now that the trail to the top of Lassen Peak was finally open (for the first time since 2009!), I had to climb this highest point (10,457') of Shasta County and southernmost volcano of the Cascade Range.
I left Manzanita Lake Campground in the quiet moonlit-night at 5:00 a.m, where the temperature was 39 degrees F and the wind was calm. The previous night was rainy and gusty, and the top of Lassen Peak had been skulking through puffy clouds much of the previous blustery day.
Sunrise from Lassen Peak, with Reading Peak on the right. |
Lassen Peak from Manzanita Lake the day before. |
Saturday, August 22, 2015
USDA blindERS misranks California counties on the Natural Amenities Scale
Last week the Washington Post posted an awesome article and maps entitled "Every county in America, ranked by scenery and climate." It includes a very cool graphic that shows each county rank as a mouseover. It also contains separate maps for each amenity used to create the overall index: average January temperature, average January days of sun, low winter-summer temperature gap, low average July humidity, topography scale, and water area as a proportion of the County. Click on the map below to go to the article.
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Why Marin County's Reservoirs are Full This Year
Is it time to remove Nicasio Dam? I've been asking myself this question ever since I came across this great report from the 1960s on the effects of Nicasio Dam on Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout. So I added up the unused portions of Kent, Nicasio, and
Soulajule Reservoirs, since most have been kept pretty full since 1977 and all since
1992. We have a reservoir the size of Nicasio Reservoir sitting unused at the
bottom of these three reservoirs. Add unused
storage in Alpine Reservoir, and the numbers work out even better. If we allowed the full use of the reservoir
capacities of Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD), instead of always keeping them more than half full, it effectively doubles the available water storage, and would make the presence of Nicasio Dam and Reservoir unnecessary. The following graphs from CDEC show the amount of water unused sitting on the bottom of each reservoir:
Alpine Reservoir levels since 1977, adapted from CDEC. 3,500 acre-feet unused. |
Kent Reservoir levels since 1977, adapted from CDEC. 12,500 acre-feet unused. Note that the reservoir capacity was expanded in 1983. |
Nicasio Reservoir levels since 1977, adapted from CDEC. 8,000 acre-feet unused. |
Soulajule Reservoir levels since 1979, adapted from CDEC. 4,500 acre-feet unused. Note that the dam was built in 1979. |
Saturday, January 3, 2015
A Year Without Facebook
2014 was a year without Facebook. I was on it for 5 years, and in September 2013 I downloaded everything on my wall and deleted my account.
Why did I do this? It was because checking Facebook was becoming one more thing I "had" to do, like checking the mail or email. And since it sucks you in and is endless (like the rest of the Internet), it could be a colossal waste of time. And I've always found that not having something (such as a TV for most of my adult life, or a car for three years, or ice cream in the freezer) makes it a lot easier not to spend (waste) time (and money) doing it.
The final nail in the Facebook coffin was its constantly-changing privacy policies, and inflexible rules for what was public and what was private, and how much control I could have over my account. Plus the Facebook Corporation doesn't seem to be the nicest one to be supporting and giving control over my personal information.
Why did I do this? It was because checking Facebook was becoming one more thing I "had" to do, like checking the mail or email. And since it sucks you in and is endless (like the rest of the Internet), it could be a colossal waste of time. And I've always found that not having something (such as a TV for most of my adult life, or a car for three years, or ice cream in the freezer) makes it a lot easier not to spend (waste) time (and money) doing it.
The final nail in the Facebook coffin was its constantly-changing privacy policies, and inflexible rules for what was public and what was private, and how much control I could have over my account. Plus the Facebook Corporation doesn't seem to be the nicest one to be supporting and giving control over my personal information.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)