And then there is the opposite strategy for reintroduction locations, such as the Santa Ana Mountains, which might not be big enough for a sustainable reintroduced population... but it would sure get the attention of the neighbors, and not just because mountain lions would no longer be the only ones eating backyard pets. Putting grizzlies right in the middle of the most populous megalopolis isn't necessarily a good idea, even if it might help reduce the Republican population. And I'm not just having a knee jerk reaction like the people that don't want to consider returning grizzlies to California at all--I mean, have you been to Orange County? But if you look just to the north...
The LA Times says that the lush estuaries and coastal environments where the best California Grizzly habitat was "are now dense with Californians." Not so fast. Below are the reprinted pages (in screenshots) of my former Website, last edited about 10 years ago. Pay particular attention to California Grizzly Bear Recovery Area 3: 2.4 million acres of mostly public land, including a lot of wilderness, a National Monument, with about 1 person per square mile living in the core area.
There you go. I hope you enjoy the resurrection of long-dead things: an animal from 90 years ago and a piece of a Website with my ideas from 10 years ago. And maybe, someday in the future, the schoolkids in Cuyama won't have only endangered California Condors eating their lunch scraps, but California Grizzlies too. We'll just have to make sure they eat the lunch scraps and not the kids. Which is totally doable. We are a capable people.
No comments:
Post a Comment