The Nov 22nd and Dec 14th peak flows on San Geronimo Creek were the same: 1,105 cfs. Daily average flows were 423 cfs & 356 cfs, respectively. In November it took 8.75 hrs of 2.34" of rain (1/4" per hour) to get to peak from 113 cfs; In December it took 7.25 hrs of 2.32" of rain (1/3" per hour). These calculations use rounded times to the nearest hour for rain and quarter hour for flow & add an hour of lag time between rain and flow. |
And then things got crazy.
25.16" of rain at the end of December 2024 is 57% of our annual average and 164% of the Oct-Dec average. |
2013 water year (30" of rain) for comparison. The 2013 calendar year was the driest on record. Average is 45". |
And now for something fascinating--I divided the volume of runoff by the volume of rain (estimated for a 6,000-acre watershed) to estimate the runoff efficiency of the last three water years. I got a very surprising result. We know 2023 was a wet year--but only for rain. A lot of that rain soaked into the ground, making the runoff that year actually lower than 2024. 2024 had near-average precipitation, but more runoff than the wet year of 2023.
2023 was wetter for rain and 2024 was wetter for runoff. So far, Oct-Dec of Water Year 2025 has similar runoff efficiency as 2024. |
So the interesting question this table raises is, "what happened in the Autumn of 2022?" For similar rainfall as 2023, why was the runoff efficiency less than half of the other years? Summer 2023 had a much higher baseflow than 2022. Even though there was 3/4 of an inch of rain near the end of September 2022, October of 2023 started out with more than double the baseflow of October 2022. So the antecedent conditions--groundwater levels and flows--were much wetter in 2023.